|
Article
The skull of Arsinoitherium (Mammalia, Embrithopoda) and the higher order interrelationships of ungulates
Published online: 17/12/1992
Keywords:
Arsinoitherium; PHYLOGENY; Skull; Ungulate
https://doi.org/10.18563/pv.22.1.1-43
References: 92
Cite this article:
Nicholas Court, 1992. The skull of Arsinoitherium (Mammalia, Embrithopoda) and the higher order interrelationships of ungulates. PalaeoVertebrata 22 (1): 1-43. doi: 10.18563/pv.22.1.1-43
Export citation
Abstract
Detailed anatomical description of arsinoithere cranial remains from the Lower Oligocene, Fayum Depression, Egypt, provides the basic data for a systematic investigation. All cranial and some postcranial features are assessed from a phylogenetic standpoint. Several soft tissue characters are then added to a cladistic analysis based on 54 derived ungulate morphological characters. The resulting phylogenetic hypothesis implies that perissodactyls, sirenians, proboscideans and arsinoitheres constitute a monophyletic unit (5 synapomorphies). However, increasing the tree length by 3 steps reveals a closer association between hyraxes and perissodactyls. Nevertheless, 13 synapomorphies link proboscideans, sirenians and arsinoitheres to the exclusion of all other ungulates. Form of the sphenopalatine and ethmoid foramina, recurved posttympanic process, absence of a fenestra rotundum in the petrosal, vestigial paroccipital process of the exoccipital and the highly unusual absence of a hypoglossal foramen in the skull, imply a robust sister-group relationship between arsinoitheres and proboscideans. In this analysis artiodactyls share only one derived character with all other ungulates studied. Monophyly of Ungulata, including Artiodactyla, is therefore only weakly supported. It is argued that pedal anatomy of hyraxes is non-homologous with that of Tethytheria. Arsinoitherium should now be classified within Tethytheria, sharing a sister-group relationship with Proboscidea. Hyraxes are excluded, thus refuting the concept of Paenungulata. However, monophyly of the wider concept, Pantomesaxonia, containing hyraxes, perissodactyls, sirenians, proboscideans and now, arsinoitheres, is supported by this study.
Published in Vol. 22, Fasc. 1 (1992)
References
ANDREWS, C.W., 1906. — A Descriptive Catalogue of the Tertiary Vertebrata of the Fayum, Egypt. British Museum (Natural History), London, 324 pp.
BEADNELL, H.J.L., 1901. — The Fayum Depression: A preliminary notice of the geology of a district in Egypt containing a new Palaeogene fauna. Geological Magazine, 8: 540-546. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0016756800180392
BEADNELL, H.J.L., 1902. — A preliminary note on Arsinoitherium zitteli Beadnell from the upper Eocene strata of Egypt. Egyptian Survey Department, Public Works Ministry, Cairo, 4 pp. https://doi.org/10.5962/bhl.title.77308
BEADNELL, H.J.L., 1905. — The topography and geology of the Fayum Province of Egypt. Cairo Survey Department, 101 pp.
BLAINVILLE, H. de, 1844. — Ostéographie, fasc. 15: Des lamantins, ou gravigrades aquatiques. Pp. 1-140. Fain et Thunot, Paris.
BOWN, T.M., KRAUS, M.J., WING, S.L., FLEAGLE, J.G., TIFFNEY, B.H., SIMONS, E.L. & VONDRA, C.F., 1982. — The Fayum primate forest revisited. Journal of Human Evolution, 11: 603-632. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0047-2484(82)80008-0
BOWN, T.M. & KRAUS, M.J., 1988. — Geology and paleoenvironment of the Jebel Qatrani Formation and adjacent rocks, Fayum depression, Egypt. U.S. Geological Survey Professional Paper, 1452: 1-64. https://doi.org/10.3133/pp1452
BUTLER, P.M., 1956. — The skull of Ictops and the classification of the Insectivora. Proceedings, Zoological Society, London, 126: 453-481. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1096-3642.1956.tb00449.x
CARROL, R.L., 1988. — Vertebrate Paleontology and Evolution. W.H. Freeman and Company, New York, 649 pp.
CARTMILL, M., 1975. — Strepsirrhine basicranial structures and affinities of the Cheirogaleidae. Pp. 313-356. In: W.P. LUCKETT & F.S. SZALAY (Eds.), Phylogeny of the Primates: A Multidisciplinary Approach. Plenum Press, New York. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4684-2166-8_14
CIFELLI, R.L., 1982. — The petrosal structure of Hyopsodus with respect to that of some other ungulates, and its phylogenetic implications. Journal of Paleontology, 56: 795-805.
CIFELLI, R.L., 1983. — Eutherian tarsals from the Late Paleocene of Brazil. American Museum Novitates, 2761: 1-31.
COOMBS, M.C. & COOMBS, W.P., 1982. — Anatomy of the ear region of four Eocene artiodactyls: Gobiohyus, ?Helohyus, Diacodexis and Homacodon. Journal of Vertebrate Paleontology, 2: 219-236. https://doi.org/10.1080/02724634.1982.10011931
COPE, E.D., 1897. — The position of the Periptychidae. American Naturalist, 31: 335-336. https://doi.org/10.1086/276634
COURT, N., 1989. — Morphology, functional anatomy and phylogeny of Arsinoitherium (Mammalia, Embrithopoda). PhD. Thesis, University of Bristol.
COURT, N., 1990. — Periotic anatomy of Arsinoitherium (Mammalia, Embrithopoda) and its phylogenetic implications. Journal of Vertebrate Paleontology, 10: 170-182. https://doi.org/10.1080/02724634.1990.10011806
CRACRAFT, J., 1981. — The use of functional and adaptive criteria in phylogenetic systematics. American Zoologist, 21: 21-36. https://doi.org/10.1093/icb/21.1.21
DOMNING, D., RAY, C.E. & McKENNA, M.C., 1986. — Two new Oligocene desmostylians and a discussion of tethytherian systematics. Smithsonian Contributions to Paleobiology, 59: 1-56. https://doi.org/10.5479/si.00810266.59.1
EDINGER, T., 1948. — Evolution of the horse brain. Geological Society of America, 25: 1-177. https://doi.org/10.1130/MEM25-p1
ELDREDGE, N. & CRACRAFT, J., 1980. — Phylogenetic Patterns and the Evolutionary Process. Columbia University Press, New York.
FISCHER, M.S., 1986. — Die Stellung der Schliefer (Hyracoidea) im phylogenetischen System der Eutheria. Courier Forschung-Institut Senckenberg, 84: 1-132.
FISCHER, M.S., 1989. — Hyracoids, the sister-group of perissodactyls. In: D.R. PROTHERO & R.M. SCHOCH (Eds.), The Evolution of Perissodactyls. Oxford University Press, New York.
FISCHER, M.S., 1990. — Un trait unique de l'oreille des éléphants et des siréniens (Mammalia): un paradoxe phylogénétique. C. r. Acad. Sci. Paris, sér. D. (in press).
FLEAGLE, J.G., BOWN, T.M., OBRADOVICH, J.M. & SIMONS, E.L., 1986. — Age of the earliest African anthropoids. Science, 234: 1247-1249. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.234.4781.1247
FLEISHER, G.V., 1973. — Studien am Skelett des Gehörorganes der Säugetiere, einschließlich des Menschen. Säugetierkundl. Mitteilungen, München, 21: 131-239.
GAMBARYAN, P.P., 1974. — How Mammals Run. J. Wiley & Sons, New York, 367 pp.
GAZIN, C.L., 1965. — A study of the early Tertiary condylarthran mammal Meniscotherium. Smithsonian Miscellaneous Collections, 149 (2): 1-98.
GAZIN, C.L., 1968. — A study of the Eocene condylarthran mammal Hyopsodus. Smithsonian Miscellaneous Collections, 153 (4): 1-90.
GINGERICH, P.D., 1976. — Cranial anatomy and evolution of Early Tertiary Plesiadapidae (Mammalia, Primates). Papers in Paleontology, 15: 1-117, Michigan.
GREGORY, W.K., 1910. — The orders of mammals. Bulletins of the American Museum of Natural History, 27: 1-524. https://doi.org/10.5962/bhl.title.15687
GREGORY, W.K., 1912. — Notes on the principles of quadrupedal locomotion and of the mechanics of the limbs in hoofed mammals. Annals, New York Academy of Science, 22: 267-294. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1749-6632.1912.tb55164.x
GREGORY, W.K., 1920. — Studies in comparative myology and osteology: no. IV. A review of the evolution of the lacrimal in vertebrates with special reference to that of the mammals. Bulletin, American Museum of Natural History, 42: 95-263.
HARRIS, J.M., 1973. — Prodeinotherium from Gebel Zelten Libya. Bulletin, British Museum (Natural History), 23: 285-348.
HENNIG, W., 1966. — Phylogenetic Systematics. University of Illinois Press, Urbana, 263 pp.
KELLOGG, R., 1936. — A review of the Archaeoceti. Carnegie Inst. Washington Publ., 482: 1-366.
KIELAN-JAWOROWSKA, Z., 1981. — Evolution of the therian mammals in the Late Cretaceous of Asia. Part IV. Skull structure in Kennalestes and Asioryctes. In: Z. KIELAN-JAWOROWSKA (Ed.), Results of the Polish-Mongolian Palaeontological Expeditions. Part IX. Palaeontologica Polonica, 42: 25-78.
KLAAUW, C.J. van der, 1931. — The auditory bulla in some fossil mammals. Bulletin American Museum of Natural History, 62: 1-352.
LANKESTER, E.R., 1870. — On the use of the term homology in modern zoology, and the distinction between homogenetic and homoplasic agreements. Annals Magazine of Natural History, 6: 34-43. https://doi.org/10.1080/00222937008696201
LANKESTER, E.R., 1903. — A new extinct monster. Sphere, p. 238.
LE GROS CLARK, W.E., 1959. — The Antecedents of Man. Edinburgh University Press, Edinburgh.
LUCKETT, W.P., 1977. — Ontogeny of amniote fetal membranes and their application to phylogeny. Pp. 439-516. In: M.K. HECHT, P.C. GOODY & B.M. HECHT (Eds.), Major Patterns in Vertebrate Evolution. Plenum Press, New York. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4684-8851-7_16
MAHABOUBI, M., AMEUR, R., CROCHET, J.Y. & JAEGER, J.J., 1986. — El Kohol (Saharan Atlas, Algeria): a new Eocene mammal locality in North-west Africa. Palaeontographica, Abt. A., 192: 15-49.
MATSUMOTO, H., 1923. — A contribution to the knowledge of Moeritherium. Bulletin, American Museum of Natural History, 48: 97-139.
MATTHEW, W.D., 1897. — A revision of the Puerco fauna. Bulletin, American Museum of Natural History, 9: 249-323.
MATTHEW, W.D., 1909. — The Carnivora and Insectivora of the Bridger Basin, middle Eocene. Memoirs, American Museum of Natural History, 9: 289-567.
McDOWELL, S.B., 1958. — The Greater Antillean insectivores. Bulletin, American Museum of Natural History, 115: 113-214.
MacINTYRE, G.T., 1972. — The trisulcate petrosal pattern of mammals. Pp. 275-303. In: T. DOBZHANSKY, M.K. HECHT & W.C. STEERE (Eds.), Evolutionary Biology, vol. 6. Appleton-Century-Crofts, New York. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4684-9063-3_9
McKENNA, M.C., 1975. — Towards a phylogenetic classification of the Mammalia. Pp. 21-46. In: W.P. LUCKETT & F.S. SZALAY (Eds.), Phylogeny of the Primates: A Multidisciplinary Approach. Plenum Press, New York. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4684-2166-8_2
McKENNA, M.C. & MANNING, E., 1977. — Affinities and palaeobigeographical significance of the Mongolian Paleogene genus Phenacolophus. Geobios, Mémoire spécial 1: 61-85. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0016-6995(77)80008-9
MULLER, J., 1934. — The orbitotemporal region in the skull of the Mammalia. Archiv. Neerl. Zool., 1: 118-259. https://doi.org/10.1163/187530134X00062
NOVACEK, M.J., 1980. — Cranioskeletal features in tupaiids and selected eutherians as phylogenetic evidence. Pp. 35-93. In: W.P. LUCKETT (Ed.), Comparative Biology and Evolutionary Relationships of Tree Shrews. Advances in Primatology 4. Plenum Press, New York. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4684-1051-8_2
NOVACEK, M.J., 1986. — The skull of leptictid insectivorans and the higher level classification of the eutherian mammals. Bulletin, American Museum of Natural History, 183: 1-111.
NOVACEK, M.J. & WYSS, A.R., 1986. — Higher level relationships of the Recent eutherian orders: morphological evidence. Cladistics, 2: 257-287. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1096-0031.1986.tb00463.x
NOVACEK, M.J. & WYSS, A.R., 1987. — Selected features of the desmostylian skeleton and their phylogenetic implications. American Museum Novitates, 2870: 1-8.
NOVACEK, M.J., WYSS, A.R. & McKENNA, M.C., 1988. — The major groups of eutherian mammals. Pp. 31-71. In: M.J. BENTON (Ed.), Phylogeny and Classification of the Tetrapods. Systematic Association Special Volume 35B. Clarendon Press, Oxford.
OSBORN, H.F., 1927. — The titanotheres of ancient Wyoming, Dakota and Nebraska. Monographs U.S. Geological Survey.
OWEN, R., 1843. — Lectures in Comparative Anatomy. Longman, Brown, Green and Longmans, London.
OWEN, R., 1848. — Description of teeth and portions of jaws of two extinct anthracotherioid quadrupeds in the Eocene deposits of the N.W. coast of the Isle of Wight. Quarterly Journal of the Geological Society, London, 4: 103-144. https://doi.org/10.1144/GSL.JGS.1848.004.01-02.21
PATTERSON, C., 1982. — Morphological characters and homology. Pp. 21-74. In: K.A. JOYSEY & A.E. FRIDAY (Eds.), Problems of Phylogenetic Reconstruction. Academic Press, London and New York.
PATTERSON, C., 1987. — Introduction. Pp. 1-22. In: C. PATTERSON (Ed.), Molecules and Morphology in Evolution: Conflict or Compromise? Cambridge University Press.
PATTERSON, C. & ROSEN, D.E., 1987. — Review of Ichthyodectiforms and other Mesozoic teleost fishes and the theory and practice of classifying fossils. Bulletin, American Museum of Natural History, 185: 81-172.
PRESLEY, R., 1979. — The primitive course of the internal carotid artery in mammals. Acta Anatomica, 103: 238-244. https://doi.org/10.1159/000145015
PROTHERO, D.R., MANNING, E.M. & FISCHER, M., 1988. — The phylogeny of the ungulates. Pp. 201-234. In: M.J. BENTON (Ed.), Phylogeny and Classification of the Tetrapods. Systematics Association Special Volume 35B. Clarendon Press, Oxford.
RADINSKY, L.B., 1966. — The adaptive radiation of the phenacodontid condylarths and the origin of the Perissodactyla. Evolution, 20: 408-417. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1558-5646.1966.tb03375.x
RADULESCO, C., ILIESCO, G. & ILIESCO, M., 1976. — Découverte d'un Embrithopode nouveau (Mammalia) dans le Paléogène de la dépression de Hateg (Roumanie) et considération générale sur la géologie de la région. Neues Jahrb. Geol. Paläontol., Monatsh., 11: 690-698.
REMY, J.A., 1972. — Etude du crâne de Pachynolophus lavocati n. sp. (Perissodactyla, Palaeotheridae) des phosphorites du Quercy. Palaeovertebrata, 5: 45-78. https://doi.org/10.18563/pv.5.2.45-78
RUSSELL, D.E., 1964. — Les Mammifères paléocènes d'Europe. Mémoires du Muséum National d'Histoire Naturelle, Paris, série C, 13: 1-324.
RUSSELL, D.E., THEWISSEN, J.G.M. & SIGOGNEAU-RUSSELL, D., 1983. — A new dicobunid artiodactyl (Mammalia) from the Eocene of north-west Pakistan. Proc. Kon. Ned. Akad. Wet., B, 86: 285-99.
SAVAGE, R.J.G., 1976. — Review of early Sirenia. Systematic Zoology, 25: 344-351. https://doi.org/10.2307/2412509
SAVAGE, R.J.G. & LONG, M.R., 1986. — Mammalian evolution: an illustrated guide. British Museum (Natural History), London, 225 pp.
SEN, S. & HEINTZ, E., 1979. — Palaeoamasia kansui Ozansoy 1966, embrithopode (Mammalia) de l'Eocene d'Anatolie. Annales de Paléontologie (Vertébrés), 65: 73-91.
SCHAEFFER, B., 1947. — Notes on the origin and function of the artiodactyl tarsus. American Museum Novitates, 1356: 1-24.
SHOSHANI, J., 1986. — Mammalian phylogeny: comparison of morphological and molecular results. Molecular Biology and Evolution, 3: 222-242.
SIMONS, E.L., 1960. — The Paleocene Pantodonta. Transactions of the American Philosophical Society, 50 (6): 3-80. https://doi.org/10.2307/1005810
SIMONS, E.L., 1990. — Discovery of the earliest known anthropoidean skull from the Paleogene of Egypt. Science, 247: 1567-1569. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.2108499
SIMONS, E.L. & WOOD, A.E., 1968. — Early Cenozoic mammalian faunas, Fayum Province, Egypt. Bulletin Peabody Museum of Natural History, 28: 1-105.
SIMPSON, G.G., 1945. — The principles of classification and a classification of mammals. Bulletin, American Museum of Natural History, 85: 1-350.
SISSON, S. & GROSSMAN, J.D., 1947. — The Anatomy of the Domestic Animals. 3rd. edit. New York, 972 pp.
SMITH, J.M. & SAVAGE, R.J.G., 1956. — Some locomotion adaptations in mammals. Zoological Journal of the Linnean Society, 42: 603-622. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1096-3642.1956.tb02220.x
SZALAY, F.Z., 1977. — Phylogenetic relationships and a classification of the eutherian Mammalia. Pp. 375-394. In: M.K. HECHT, P.C. GOODY & B.M. HECHT (Eds.), Major Patterns in Vertebrate Evolution. NATO Advanced Study Inst., Series A, 14. Plenum Press, New York.
SZALAY, F.Z. & DRAWHORN, G., 1980. — Evolution and diversification of the Archonta in an arboreal milieu. Pp. 133-169. In: W.P. LUCKETT (Ed.), Comparative Biology and Evolutionary Relationships of Tree Shrews. Plenum Press, New York. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4684-1051-8_4
TASSY, P., 1981. — Le crâne de Moeritherium (Proboscidea, Mammalia) de l'Eocène de Dor el Talha (Libye) et le problème de la classification phylogénétique du genre dans les Tethytheria McKenna 1975. Bull. Mus. natl. Hist. nat., Paris, Ser. 4, C3: 87-147.
TASSY, P. & SHOSHANI, J., 1988. — The Tethytheria; elephants and their relatives. Pp. 283-315. In: M.J. BENTON (Ed.), The Phylogeny and Classification of the Tetrapods, Vol. 2: Mammals. The Systematics Association Special Volume No. 35B. Clarendon Press, Oxford.
THEWISSEN, J.G.M., 1985. — Cephalic evidence for the affinities of Tubulidentata. Mammalia, 49: 257-284. https://doi.org/10.1515/mamm.1985.49.2.257
TOMLINSON, P.B., 1984. — Homology: an empirical view. Systematic Botany, 9: 269-318. https://doi.org/10.2307/2418786
WIBLE, J.R., 1983. — The internal carotid artery in early eutherians. Acta Palaeontologica Polonica, 28: 174-180.
WIBLE, J.R., 1986. — Transformation of the extracranial course of the internal carotid artery in mammalian phylogeny. Journal of Vertebrate Paleontology, 6: 313-325. https://doi.org/10.1080/02724634.1986.10011628
WIBLE, J.R., 1987. — The eutherian stapedial artery: character analysis and implications for superordinal relationships. Zoological Journal of the Linnean Society, 91: 107-135. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1096-3642.1987.tb01725.x
WILEY, E.O., 1981. — Phylogenetics: The Theory and Practice of Phylogenetic Systematics. Wiley, New York.
WINDLE, B.G. & PARSONS, F.G., 1897. — On the muscles of Ungulata. Proceedings Zoological Society London: 656-704. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1469-7998.1902.tb08194.x
WISLOCKI, G.B. & WESTHUYSEN, O.P., 1940. — The placentation of Procavia capensis, with a discussion of the placental affinities of Hyracoidea. Contributions to Embryology, 28: 65-88.
YALDEN, D.W., 1971. — The functional morphology of the carpus in ungulate mammals. Acta Anatomica, 78: 461-487. https://doi.org/10.1159/000143609
|
PDF
|
