Issue


1983-09
Vol. 13, Fasc. 3
<< prev. next >>

Print ISSN: 0031-0247
Online ISSN:
2274-0333
Frequency: biannual

Article Management

You must log in to submit or manage articles.

You do not have an account yet ? Sign up.

PalaeoVertebrata Vol. 13, Fasc. 3
<< prev. article next article >>

Article

Agriotherium intermedium (Stach 1957) from a Pliocene fissure filling of Xiaoxian County (Anhuei Province, China) and the phylogenetic position of the genus.
Zhanxiang Qiu and Norbert Schmidt-Kittler
Published online: 30/09/1983

Keywords: Carnivora; China; PHYLOGENY; Pliocene; skull anatomy; Ursidae

https://doi.org/10.18563/pv.13.3.65-81

References: 23

Cite this article: Zhanxiang Qiu and Norbert Schmidt-Kittler, 1983. Agriotherium intermedium (Stach 1957) from a Pliocene fissure filling of Xiaoxian County (Anhuei Province, China) and the phylogenetic position of the genus. PalaeoVertebrata 13 (3): 65-81. doi: 10.18563/pv.13.3.65-81

Export citation

Abstract

A fragmentary mandible and maxilla of a small sized Agriotherium of a young individual discovered from a Pliocene fissure filling in Xiaoxian county (Anhuei Province, China) are described. Judging from the morphology of the dentition and its dimensions the new material can be identified as Agriotherium inlermedium (STACH l957). Hendey's proposition (1980) that the Agriotherium species are derived from Indarctos is reconsídered on the basis of the new documents. As a result of a more general phylogenetic discussion it can be stated, that: 1. the supposed size increase as well as other trends, leading from Indarctos to Agriotherium are untenable ; 2. there are no positive indications to assume a phylogenetic transition of these two genera. 3. there are no real arguments in favor of an adaptational reversal in the evolution of Agriotherium. Hence, many features of that genus supposed by Hendey to be derived are plesiomorphic ; 4. regardless of the previous points it is methodologícally impossible to establish direct ancestor - descendant relationships between Indarctos and Agriotherium species, as Hendey did. Based on the data available and especially on the characters of the new material from China it is more likely that Agriotherium and Indarctos are two genera which developed independently. While advanced Agriotherium species, e.g. A. africanum, resemble in some respects Indarctos by adaptational analogies, more primitive species, e.g. Agriotherium intermedium, are quite dissimilar to lndarctos. While Indarctos might be derived from an Ursavus like forerunner, Agriotherium has its roots more likely somewhere in between Ursavus and the Hemicyon-group. 



Published in Vol. 13, Fasc. 3 (1983)

References

COLBERT E.H., 1935. — Siwalik mammals in the American Museum of Natural History. Trans. Am. Philos. Soc., n.s., 26: 89-93. https://doi.org/10.2307/1005467

CRUSAFONT-PAIRO M. & KURTÉN B., 1976. — Bears and bear-dogs from the Vallesian of the Vallés-Penedés Basin, Spain. Acta zool. Fenn., 144: 1-29.

DEPÉRET C. and LLUECA G., 1928. — Sur l’Indarctos arctoides et la phylogénie des ursidés. Bull. Soc. géol. Fr., (4) 28: 149-160.

ENGELMANN G.F. and WILEY E.O., 1977. — The Place of Ancestor-Descendant Relationships in Phylogeny Reconstruction. Systematic Zool., 26 (1): 1-11. https://doi.org/10.1093/sysbio/26.1.1

ERDBRINK D.P., 1953. — A review of fossil and recent bears of the Old World with remarks on their phylogeny based upon their dentition II. Publ. Min. Geol. Inst. Univ. Utrecht, 321-597.

FRICK C., 1926. — The Hemicyoninae and the American Tertiary bear. Bull. Amer. Mus. Nat. Hist., 56 (1): 1-119.

HELBING H., 1932. — Über einen Indarctos-Schädel aus dem Pontien der Insel Samos. Abh. Schweiz. pal. Ges., 52: 1-18.

HENDEY Q.B., 1972. — A Pliocene ursid from South Africa. Ann. S. Afr. Mus., 59: 115-132.

HENDEY Q.B., 1977. — Fossil bear from South Africa. S. Afr. J. Sci., 73: 112-116.

LICENT F. and TRASSAERT M., 1935. — The Pliocene lacustrine series in Central Shansi. Bull. Geol. Soc. China, 14. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1755-6724.1935.mp14002005.x

LYDEKKER R., 1884. — Siwalik and Narbada carnivora. Pal. Ind., 10 (2): 202-239.

MATTHEW W.D., 1929. — Critical observations upon Siwalik mammals. Bull. Amer. Mus. Nat. Hist., 56 (7): 437-560.

PETERS D.St. and GUTMANN W.F., 1971. — Über die Lesrichtung von Merkmals- und Konstruktions-Reihen. Z. f. zool. Systematik u. Evolutionsforsch., 9 (4): 237-263. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1439-0469.1971.tb00900.x

PILGRIM G.E., 1913. — The Correlation of the Siwaliks with the Mammal Horizons of Europe. Rec. Geol. Surv. India, 43: 264-326.

PILGRIM G.E., 1931. — Catalogue of the Pontian carnivora of Europe, 1-174.

PILGRIM G.E., 1932. — The fossil carnivora of India. Pal. Ind., n.s., 18, 1-232.

SCHLOSSER M., 1903. — Die fossilen Säugetiere Chinas. Abh. bayer. Akad. Wiss., Math.-Phys. Kl., 22: 1-221.

STACH J., 1957. — Agriotherium intermedium n. sp. from the Pliocene Bone Breccia of Weze. Acta Pal. Pol., 2 (1): 1-17.

STEHLIN H.G., 1907. — Les types du « Lophiodon de Montpellier » de Cuvier (Hyaenarctos insignis Gerv.). Bull. Soc. géol. France, 4e sér., 7: 219.

THENIUS E., 1959. — Indarctos arctoides (Carnivora, Mammalia) aus dem Pliozän Österreichs nebst einer Revision der Gattung. N. Jb. Geol. u. Pal., Abh., 108 (3): 270-295.

TOBIEN H., 1955. — Neue und wenig bekannte Carnivoren aus den unterpliozänen Dinotheriensanden Rheinhessens. Notizbl. Hess. L.-Amt f. Bodenf., 83: 7-31.

VIRET J., 1939. — Monographie paléontologique de la faune de vertébrés des sables de Montpellier. III. Carnivora fissipedia. Trav. Labor. geol. Fac. Sci., 37 (2): 3-26.

ZDANSKY O., 1924. — Jungtertiäre Carnivoren Chinas. Pal. Sin., C, 2 (1): 1-149. 


PDF